Are Your Mutual Funds Jeopardizing Your Retirement?
Active mutual funds are frequently burdened with high fees, tax inefficiencies, and disappointing returns.
John C. Bogle, the founder and former chief executive of the Vanguard Group, explored the impact of investment expenses on mutual fund returns versus low-cost index funds in his paper titled “The Arithmetic of ‘All-In’ Investment Expenses.” Bogle asserts that “compared with costly actively managed funds, over time, low-cost index funds create extra wealth of 65% for retirement plan investors.” He evaluates the overall costs within pre-tax accounts and estimates the overall cost of mutual funds to be closer to 2.27%, while the average index fund cost is approximately 0.06%.
Bogle reinforces his findings with a hypothetical scenario: a 30-year-old invests 10% of their income into a tax-deferred 401(k) or IRA. Starting with a $30,000 salary, which increases by 3% annually, and assuming a 7% investment return, they could amass approximately $927,000 in an index fund by age 70. In contrast, an active mutual fund would yield around $561,000—a staggering difference with nearly one-third of the potential gains devoured by the costs of active management.
The fees associated with actively managed funds are substantial – sales charges, high expense ratios, and additional transaction costs chip away at your investment returns. An upfront fee of 5% is not uncommon. This means only 95 cents of every dollar is put to work, instantly putting you at a loss.
Then, there’s the often-overlooked ‘cash drag.’ Active funds typically hold more cash, missing out on full market participation and the benefits of compounding, while index funds stay fully invested.
For non-retirement accounts, the cost disparity is even more pronounced. Index funds offer high tax efficiency; by minimizing turnover they generate fewer taxable events. Active funds, on the other hand, often distribute capital gains annually, which investors must then report as income. This can lead to a tax bill on gains accumulated throughout the year, regardless of how long the fund has been held. Morningstar’s analysis indicates that active stock mutual funds typically carry an annual tax cost ranging from 1% to 1.2% (2).
Data from S&P Global reveals a consistent trend of underperformance by actively managed funds. In the past two decades, 94% of large-cap funds have lagged the S&P 500 benchmark.
While active funds aim to beat the market, the odds and costs are stacked against them. In contrast, index funds offer a low-cost, tax-efficient alternative that seeks exposure to a broad market or specific market sectors. These funds help deliver a diversified investment strategy that aligns with the market's long-term growth, making them a prudent choice for investors dedicated to a long-term investment horizon.
For more information on how fees affect your investment portfolio, visit the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) article titled “How Fees and Expenses Affect Your Investment Portfolio” by visiting the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Need help evaluating if you are on the right track for your retirement goals? We’d love to help!
Schedule a call with Evan today.
Please read important disclosures here.
Bogle, John C. “The Arithmetic of ‘All-In’ Investment Expenses.” Financial Analysts Journal, January/February 2014. Accessed [January 8th, 2024]. https://johncbogle.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/FAJ-All-In-Investment-Expenses-Jan-Feb-2014.pdf.
"How Tax-Efficient Is Your Mutual Fund?" Morningstar.com. Accessed [January 8th, 2024]. https://www.morningstar.com/articles/308356/how-tax-efficient-is-your-mutual-fund.
"After-Tax Performance." Alpha Architect. Accessed[January 8th, 2024]. https://alphaarchitect.com/2023/12/after-tax-performance/#:~:text=Over%20the%2020%2Dyear%20horizon,on%20an%20after%2Dtax%20basis.